Something else to be worried about? Why not? It’s not like you have enough on your plate already.
In truth, the emerging risk shouldn’t surprise the banking industry. You’re already used to addressing NSF and OD fee class-action suits, ADA legal action, and, oh yeah, the effects of COVID-19. What’s one more thing?
It could be a lot. From a legal and compliance standpoint, this latest challenge could have severe implications for credit unions. Especially large institutions which embrace indirect in their auto loan portfolios.
As a great author once said, Don’t Panic. Let’s start at the beginning.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
In March of 2019, the CFPB issued their Supervisory Highlights. The findings covered “examinations in the areas of automobile loan servicing, deposits, mortgage servicing”. Since we’re talking auto lending, let’s look deeper at why that topic was important to the CFPB.
According to the report, they wanted to review “auto loan servicing activities, primarily to assess whether servicers have engaged in unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices (UDAAPs) prohibited by the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA).”
You’re not doing anything unfairly, deceptive, or abusive, right? So why is this even relevant? Digging further, we discover their real reason:
Reviewing “[u]nfair and deceptive practices regarding refunds for certain ancillary products.”
Ancillary Product refunds
Your borrowers do sometimes purchase ancillary products. It’s a great way to build non-interest income while protecting people from the financial effects of unexpected breakdowns, totaled vehicle insurance claim gaps, and more.
These products are financed within the loan. If the borrower later experiences an event such as trading or selling their covered vehicle, or has a total loss or repossession, the servicer (that’s you, the lender) or borrower may cancel these ancillary products.
Following cancellation, the borrower or lienholder would receive prorated refunds of the premium amounts for the unused portion of each product.
In these cases, the loan servicer initiates the cancellation refund with the provider. However, that process wasn’t always completing. The CFPB examiners identified several examples wherein borrowers did not receive the correct refunds on their extended warranties (VSC).
This finding addressed actions after a total loss or repossession.
In one case, the examiners found the mileage was calculated on the vehicle’s total mileage instead of the actual miles driven by the borrower. Other cases showed that the servicer never requested a refund after the vehicle was reported as a total loss.
The average unclaimed refund was about $1,700.
These missed refunds caused the borrower to have a larger-than-expected deficiency. The CFPB deemed it unfair, calling them instances of UDAAP.
While the CFPB reached agreements and set up appropriate resolutions with the lenders and servicers involved, the wheels of future litigation were now in motion.
Which Protection Products?
You offer auto loans. You and your dealers also offer ancillary products which can receive pro-rata refunds. The liability exists. Which protection products? As of publication, the following are worth your attention (keep in mind, others may also apply):
- Credit Disability Insurance
- Credit Life Insurance
- Limited Auto Coverage (Tire & Wheel, Dent & Ding)
- Vehicle Service Contract
The rest of this article is below. Make sure you don’t miss out on other content like this. Give your inbox a learning treat! 1-2 valuable emails a week.
Sign Up Now!
The NADA Reacts
The National Association of Automobile Dealers (NADA) wasn’t sitting idly by. In April of 2019, they released their Voluntary Protection Products Policy (VPPP) (Requires login).
The focus of this new policy was to:
- Affirm the dealer’s unequivocal commitment to a transparent and professional VPPP process
- State how the dealership will implement and maintain the policy
- Identify tasks the dealership will perform throughout the lifecycle of VPPPs. This starts with product selection and moves through a process for:
- Product pricing, advertisement, presentation, sale, cancellation and, should the need arise, customer complaints
The VPPP is a comprehensive system with specific focus on this topic in Section VII: Product Cancellation. The new policy helps build a methodology to make the offering, sale, and cancellation processes simpler, and more consumer friendly.
However, use of the VPPP is optional. Unlike federally-chartered credit unions, there are no federally-mandated regulations.
Yes, in this case, life is easier for them. There’s no CFPB peeking under the hood. Nor is there any true Federal compliance expectation on the dealership. This, despite the fact they also work with product providers and administrators, as well as loan servicers/lenders.
Based upon previous and current CFPB opinions, agency actions, and overriding state laws, it appears the legal onus for timely and proper refunds on protection products may fall directly to the lender.
Which is why we are all here right now. Because that question is about to be tested.
Class Action: Breach of Contract
On July 1st, 2020, a class action lawsuit was filed in Denver, CO. The suit, on behalf of the plaintiff, is against 10 financial institutions, 7 of which are credit unions. Attorneys stated the defendant list may expand to 40, involving, “hundreds, if not thousands, of members.”
What’s at issue?
The allegation includes: “All persons who: (1) entered into finance agreements with GAP Waivers in Colorado that were assigned to (named institutions) (2) who paid off their finance agreements before the end of the original maturity date, and (3) who did not receive a refund of the unearned GAP fees.”
Sidenote: In the state of Colorado, regulations require all GAP waivers sold must be refundable.
They are seeking records going back 6 years. Are you prepared or equipped to pay out that many years of potentially missed refunds?
Going Beyond GAP?
Keep in mind: Refundable GAP may only be available in 14 states, so if your institution is not doing business in one of those states, you will likely not be named in this suit.
However, other products, such as VSC, are generally refundable in all states…so you may not be out of the woods.
Direct or Indirect Loans?
That’s the million-dollar question. Literally. Are the risks higher for one category? Should credit unions consider changing their lending policies?
Direct lending puts you in control, with lines of communication to the borrower and product administrator. When cancellations arise, that administrator knows the regulations for each of your servicing states, so the process occurs smoothly.
Once notified of an early cancellation by the borrower or financial institution, your administrator processes the refund and forwards it to the lienholder. It is then checked for accuracy, and applied to your borrower’s outstanding balance or as a direct refund.
That’s it. Uncomplicated. No lawyers necessary.
Indirect lending is…different. Combine the many dealers in your network with their own providers, which can vary with each protection product. You could end up with hundreds of variables and permutations. In other words, a lot to manage.
After that complexity, what information does your institution get? A buyer’s order. On which you learn the name of the product and the price they charged your borrower.
You’re in the dark and at the same time, potentially exposed to liability. Imagine how that problem can compound with 100, 500, or 1,000 indirect loans each month.
And that’s where a growing list of institutions now find themselves.
Stop Indirect Lending
We realize this is an unlikely and undesirable solution. It doesn’t try to overcome the liability issue, rather, it sidesteps it altogether, reducing exposure moving forward. However, even if you stopped indirect lending today, you’d still have potential liability from previous years.
So even as a nuclear option, it’s still incomplete. Being ready to address the liability remains essential. Which leads us to…
Build a Process
Tracking these cancellations and earned refunds for all products in your loan portfolio (even when not your own) is a challenge. And it requires a process. Unfortunately, building this indirect “system” will not be quick, easy, nor cheap.
Your institution would need to invest in building a tracking platform with ongoing resources to ensure the timeliness and accuracy of refunds. Spell out dealer responsibilities in your agreements. Consider filtering out certain dealers (based on their product offering) to keep the workload lower.
That’s on top of maintaining your ongoing dealer relationships.
Of course, now your institution must account for these increased costs. Without any more income. Since these products are not your own, the only profit is from interest on the amount added to the loan. How are institutions handling this quandary?
One lender launched a “product return” fee, assessed against the dealer reserve at the loan origination. Is that strategy for you? We cannot say.
Subscribe to a 3rd Party Service
Unfortunately, even if your institution already subscribes to an indirect loan service, they may not currently have the technology to keep you out of this or similar class actions.
Since this is an emerging issue which will likely affect institutions across the country, we can make two “assumptions”:
- Indirect loan platforms are building solutions
- These solutions will be available at an unknown cost to your institution soon
Other “stand-alone” solutions may be available. We know of at least one company which claims to handle indirect-based product cancellation tracking and fulfillment. Contact your current vendor to see how their product lineup can help protect you.
Take Steps to Protect Your Institution Now
The importance and impact of the CFPB actions, alongside the ongoing class-action cannot be over-emphasized. Auto loan protection products play an essential role in reducing risk for borrowers and lenders. Now, they can also become an unexpected cost to your institution.
All lenders need to take a close look at the CFPB actions as well as emerging class action suits. If you’re involved in indirect lending, attention today is even more crucial.
Begin researching the systems and process needed to address this new challenge. Then create a path for your financial institution to become (and remain) compliant, while ensuring fairness to borrowers.
To stay current on topics important to your position and the institution as a whole, be sure to Subscribe to the Learning Library. We dive deep into a wide range of protection services, highlighting risks and concerns you likely never considered.
Plus, find new ways to better serve borrowers while growing non-interest income. All that with just an email. So until next time, keep it honest!
Blogger. Speaker. Part-time Jedi.
Focused on helping your bank or credit union grow in the face of emerging challenges.